Compare Two Drone Quotes: A Worked Scope Example

Two fictional proposals show how editing, formats and review rounds change a like-for-like comparison before a supplier is selected.

Write the required output first

Two drone quotations can describe different jobs even when they share the same headline. Before ranking prices, write a short acceptance brief: one site visit, a selected set of stills, one edited landscape film, one vertical version and one agreed review round. Add the location, access window and intended use so both suppliers can respond to the same request.

The proposals below are wholly fictional. They illustrate a comparison method and are not SkyViews prices, competitor offers or an indication of Bengaluru market rates. Both are assumed to exclude tax and cover the same travel and capture conditions. Actual taxes, rights and exclusions must be checked against the written proposals.

Normalize the missing items

Quote A lists capture and selected stills at ₹18,000. It charges ₹5,000 for the required edit, ₹2,000 for a vertical version and ₹1,000 for the required review round. Quote B lists the complete required package at ₹25,000. The relevant comparison is therefore ₹26,000 against ₹25,000.

Required item	Fictional quote A	Fictional quote B
Capture and selected stills	₹18,000	Included
Landscape edit	₹5,000	Included
Vertical version	₹2,000	Included
One review round	₹1,000	Included
Comparable total	₹26,000	₹25,000

Looking only at ₹18,000 and ₹25,000 would suggest a ₹7,000 saving that disappears when the required scope is counted. The normalized result makes B ₹1,000 lower in this example. It still does not prove B is the better supplier: delivery quality, availability and the actual exclusions need review.

Use unknown instead of zero

If Quote B merely says “editing included,” ask whether that covers the vertical version and the review round. Do not assign a zero price to an item whose inclusion is unclear. Mark it “confirmation required” and leave the comparison provisional until the supplier gives a written answer.

Keep the original quotation and a separate comparison sheet. Record the clarification date and version so that an old price is not combined with a newly expanded scope. If the client removes an output, remove it from both sides rather than leaving an unwanted deliverable in only one proposal.

Clarify what counts as a revision

A review round can mean consolidated comments on an existing edit. It may not include another site visit, a new creative direction or a change in the approved brief. Ask which changes are included, who submits the final feedback and what happens when the request changes after approval.

The same care applies to footage. “Raw files” should identify the supplied format, selection, transfer method and usage terms. An edited marketing film does not automatically include all camera originals or music rights for every channel. Record the scope that the parties actually agree, without assuming that a label settles it.

Make the decision traceable

Finish with a short decision note: required outputs, comparable totals, unresolved questions and why the chosen supplier fits the work. Keep capability evidence separate from price arithmetic. Review relevant portfolio work and ask how the proposed workflow addresses the site's constraints.

Use the packages page to understand scope options and the aerial imaging service to frame the intended output. Send the same brief when requesting quotations. A clear comparison should reduce ambiguity before booking, rather than create a dispute after delivery.

Plan your project

Share your site, dates and intended output so we can confirm a suitable scope.

Aerial Imaging & Cinematics · Compare project scope · Get in touch